![]() |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments >> IA158332014 [2014] UKAITUR IA158332014 (19 December 2014) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKAITUR/2014/IA158332014.html Cite as: [2014] UKAITUR IA158332014 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Upper Tribunal
(Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: IA/15833/2014
THE IMMIGRATION ACTS
Heard at Glasgow | Determination issued |
on 18 December 2014 | On 19 December 2014 |
|
|
Before
Mr C M G OCKELTON, VICE PRESIDENT
& UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE MACLEMAN
Between
THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT
Appellant
and
J S
Respondent
For the Appellant: Mrs M O’Brien, Senior Home Office Presenting Officer
For the Respondent: Mr A Caskie, Advocate, instructed by McGlashan Mackay, Solicitors
DETERMINATION AND REASONS
1. The SSHD appeals against a determination by First-tier Tribunal Judge J C Grant-Hutchison, allowing the appeal of Mr S “to the limited extent of remitting the case back to the respondent to fix a period of discretionary leave”.
2. At first sight, there are aspects of the determination which might be open to debate, but matters became clear on reference to the judge’s record of proceedings. The outcome in the First-tier Tribunal was agreed between the parties. It seems that the author of the SSHD’s grounds was apparently not aware of that, nor had Mrs O’Brien been provided with a file record.
3. It is unfortunate that the solicitors for Mr S did not raise the point by way of a Rule 24 response, which might have led to a rapid resolution.
4. Mrs O’Brien acknowledged that the SSHD is not practically prejudiced in any event by the outcome in the First-tier Tribunal. She did not wish to withdraw the appeal in light of the record, there being a “policy issue” about the extent to which substantive Article 8 matters are apt to be considered on an appeal under the EEA Regulations.
5. We are unable to find error of law in a determination which reaches exactly the result envisaged by both parties. The determination shall stand.
6. An anonymity order remains in place.
18 December 2014
Upper Tribunal Judge Macleman