BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments >> IA158332014 [2014] UKAITUR IA158332014 (19 December 2014)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKAITUR/2014/IA158332014.html
Cite as: [2014] UKAITUR IA158332014

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


 

Upper Tribunal

(Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: IA/15833/2014

 

 

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS

 

 

Heard at Glasgow

Determination issued

on 18 December 2014

On 19 December 2014

 

 

 

Before

 

Mr C M G OCKELTON, VICE PRESIDENT

& UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE MACLEMAN

 

 

Between

 

THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT

Appellant

and

 

J S

Respondent

 

 

For the Appellant: Mrs M O’Brien, Senior Home Office Presenting Officer

For the Respondent: Mr A Caskie, Advocate, instructed by McGlashan Mackay, Solicitors

 

 

DETERMINATION AND REASONS

1.             The SSHD appeals against a determination by First-tier Tribunal Judge J C Grant-Hutchison, allowing the appeal of Mr S “to the limited extent of remitting the case back to the respondent to fix a period of discretionary leave”.

2.             At first sight, there are aspects of the determination which might be open to debate, but matters became clear on reference to the judge’s record of proceedings. The outcome in the First-tier Tribunal was agreed between the parties. It seems that the author of the SSHD’s grounds was apparently not aware of that, nor had Mrs O’Brien been provided with a file record.

3.             It is unfortunate that the solicitors for Mr S did not raise the point by way of a Rule 24 response, which might have led to a rapid resolution.

4.             Mrs O’Brien acknowledged that the SSHD is not practically prejudiced in any event by the outcome in the First-tier Tribunal. She did not wish to withdraw the appeal in light of the record, there being a “policy issue” about the extent to which substantive Article 8 matters are apt to be considered on an appeal under the EEA Regulations.

5.             We are unable to find error of law in a determination which reaches exactly the result envisaged by both parties. The determination shall stand.

6.             An anonymity order remains in place.

 

 

 

 

18 December 2014

Upper Tribunal Judge Macleman

 

 

 


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKAITUR/2014/IA158332014.html