BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments >> IA191722014 [2014] UKAITUR IA191722014 (10 November 2014)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKAITUR/2014/IA191722014.html
Cite as: [2014] UKAITUR IA191722014

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

UPPER Tribunal

(Immigration and Asylum Chamber)

Appeal Number: IA/19172/2014

 

 

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS

 

Heard at: Field House

Determination Promulgated

On: 27 October 2014

On 10 November 2014

Prepared: 6 November 2014

 

 

 

Before

 

DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE MAILER

 

 

Between

 

Mr Vijay Kumar
no anonymity direction made

Appellant

and

 

secretary of state for the home department

Respondent

 

Representation

 

For the Appellant: Ms A Nizami, Counsel (instructed by Pioneer Solicitors)

For the Respondent: Mr S Walker, Senior Home Office Presenting Officer

 

 

DETERMINATION AND REASONS

1.               The appellant is a national of India, born on 28th May 1984. His appeal against the decision of the respondent dated 16th April 2014 to refuse his application for leave to remain in the UK as a Tier 1 (Entrepreneur) Migrant was dismissed by First-tier Tribunal Judge Narayan in a determination promulgated on 12th July 2014. The appeal was determined on the papers.

2.               He found that the appellant was not entitled to any points in respect of attributes and access to funds as required under the rules.

3.               On 1st September 2014, First-tier Tribunal Judge Page granted the appellant permission to appeal. He found the determination confusing to read. Paragraph 14 ran into nearly two pages. Without identifying any particular arguable error of law, Judge Page simply stated that given the complexity of the issues raised in the application for permission, this was a case where permission to appeal should be granted.

4.               Ms Nizami, on behalf of the appellant, gave notice of the withdrawal of the appellant's case. This she did orally at the hearing.

5.               Mr Walker did not oppose the giving of such notice of withdrawal.

6.               Pursuant to paragraph 17(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008, I consent to the withdrawal.

7.               In the circumstances, the Upper Tribunal must notify each party in writing of the withdrawal of the appellant's case under Rule 17 of the 2008 Rules.

 

 

 

Signed

Date 6/11/2014

 

C R Mailer

Deputy Upper Tribunal Judge

 


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKAITUR/2014/IA191722014.html