BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments >> IA210642013 [2014] UKAITUR IA210642013 (25 March 2014)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKAITUR/2014/IA210642013.html
Cite as: [2014] UKAITUR IA210642013

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


    Upper Tribunal

    (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Numbers: IA/21064/2013

     

     

     

    THE IMMIGRATION ACTS

     

     

    No hearing

    Promulgated on

    On 6 March 2014

    On 25 March 2014

     

     

     

     

    Before

     

    MR C M G OCKELTON, VICE PRESIDENT

     

    Between

     

    THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT

    Appellant

    and

     

     

    ANASTASIYA KRATSOVA

     

    Respondent

     

     

    DETERMINATION AND REASONS

     

     

    1.            Mrs Anastasiya Kratsova is a citizen of Belarus who appealed to the First-tier Tribunal against the decision of the respondent refusing her a permanent residence card as the family member of an EEA National. Following discussion at the hearing, the appeal was allowed. The Secretary of State now has permission to appeal.

     

    2.            Following the grant of permission I wrote to the parties seeking their comments on my proposal to dismiss the appeal, for the reasons that follow.

     

    “I note that the judge allowed the appeal simply on the basis that “the decision is not in accordance with the law”, “as the Respondent has not considered Regulation 10(5) and 14(3) of the 2006 Regulations”. Contrary to what is suggested in the Secretary of State’s grounds, the judge made no finding on whether the requirements of those or any other regulations were fulfilled.

     

    The effect of his determination is that the appellant’s application remains outstanding awaiting a lawful decision. That, as I understand the Secretary of State’s position, is exactly what was agreed at the hearing”.

     

     

    3.            Neither party has, within the time allowed for response, raised any objection.

     

    4.            There was no error of law. The Secretary of State’s appeal is dismissed.

     

     

     

     

     

     

    C M G OCKELTON

    VICE PRESIDENT OF THE UPPER TRIBUNAL

    IMMIGRATION AND ASYLUM CHAMBER

    Date: 06 March 2014

     

     

     

     

     


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKAITUR/2014/IA210642013.html