[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]
	United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments >> IA323662013 & IA323682013 [2014] UKAITUR IA323662013 (20 March 2014) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKAITUR/2014/IA323662013.html Cite as: [2014] UKAITUR IA323662013

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]

 

Upper Tribunal

(Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Numbers: IA/32366/2013

IA/32368/2013

 

 

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS

 

 

Heard at Field House	Determination Promulgated
On 05 March 2014	On 20 March 2014

 

 

Before

 

UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE GLEESON

 

Between

 

NIXSON JEKAB ANNAMALE

Sagarika Peramuna Peramuna Rallage

Appellants

 

and

 

THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT

 

Respondent

 

 

Representation:

 

For the Appellants: Mr N Paramjorthy, Counsel instructed by Capital Legal Solicitors

For the Respondent: Mr C Avery, Senior Home Office Presenting Officer

 

 

DETERMINATION AND REASONS

 

1.             The Secretary of State appealed with permission against the determination of First-tier Tribunal Judge Andonian allowing the appeals of the appellants against refusal to vary their leave to remain in the United Kingdom as a Tier 1 (Entrepreneur) and dependant and to remove them by way of directions under Section 47 of the 2006 Act.

2.             Permission was granted by First-tier Tribunal Judge Parkes on the basis that the judge’s finding that the Secretary of State had wrongly applied the “extension criteria” to the case was particularly difficult to follow. Having spent some time considering it, Mr Avery has concluded, as indeed the Tribunal had, that the decision is correct and sustainable and he therefore withdrew his opposition to the determination at the appeal.

3.             There is therefore no material error of law in the determination which stands.

Conclusions

The making of the decision of the First-tier Tribunal did not involve the making of an error on a point of law.

I do not set aside the decision.

Consequential Directions

Forthwith on receipt of this decision the respondent shall grant the appellant leave to remain for such period as is necessary to give effect to this determination.

 

 

Signed Date

 

 

Upper Tribunal Judge Gleeson