BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments >> IA457392013 [2014] UKAITUR IA457392013 (1 September 2014)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKAITUR/2014/IA457392013.html
Cite as: [2014] UKAITUR IA457392013

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


 

 

Upper Tribunal

(Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: IA/45739/2013

 

 

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS

 

 

Heard at Field House

Determination Promulgated

On 22 August 2014

On 1 September 2014

 

 

 

 

Before

 

UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE GLEESON

 

Between

 

Mr Omokayode Afolabi OsaTuberu

Appellant

 

and

 

THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT

Respondent

 

 

Representation:

 

For the Appellant: Mr W Ehimika, Solicitor of David & Vine Solicitors

For the Respondent: Mr T Melvin, Senior Home Office Presenting Officer

 

 

ERROR OF LAW

DECISION AND REASONS

 

1.             The appellant appeals with permission against the determination of First-tier Tribunal Judge Cameron dismissing his appeal against the respondent’s refusal to grant him leave to remain in the United Kingdom on Article 8 ECHR grounds under Appendix FM and paragraph 276ADE of the Immigration Rules HC 395 (as amended) and Article 8 outside the Rules.

2.             At the hearing, Judge Cameron gave the appellant leave to produce his examination results within 48 hours, and the file reflects that they were in fact provided within 24 hours. Judge Cameron makes no mention of that document in his determination. It may be that it was not linked promptly to the file, but it had been received and must be taken into account.

3.             I am satisfied that the failure to take into account these documents amounts to a material error of law in the First-tier Tribunal determination which I set aside and remit to Judge Cameron to remake on the basis of the evidence and the argument recorded and reflected in his determination and the additional documents sent by the appellant’s solicitors under cover of their facsimile letter of 10 April 2014 (five pages). I do not consider that further oral hearing is required.

Conclusions

The making of the decision of the First-tier Tribunal did involve the making of an error on a point of law.

I set aside the decision which will be remade in the First-tier Tribunal.

 

 

Signed Date 29 August 2014

 

Upper Tribunal Judge Gleeson


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKAITUR/2014/IA457392013.html