BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments >> IA476972013 [2015] UKAITUR IA476972013 (13 January 2015)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKAITUR/2015/IA476972013.html
Cite as: [2015] UKAITUR IA476972013

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


 

 

 

 

 

 

Upper Tribunal

(Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: IA/47697/2013

 

 

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS

 

 

Heard at Field House

On 8 January 2014

Determination Promulgated

On 13 January 2015

 

 

 

Before

 

DEPUTY JUDGE OF THE UPPER TRIBUNAL CHANA

 

 

Between

 

MR Muhammad Majid

(anonymity directions not made)

Appellant

and

 

THE SECRETARY Of STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT

Respondent

 

 

Representation:

For the appellant: Ms E Daykin of Counsel

For the respondent: Mr Tufn, Senior Presenting Officer

 

 

DECISION AND REASONS

 

1.      The appellant a citizen of Pakistan appealed against the respondent’s decision refusing him leave to remain indefinitely as a dependent of his mother present and settled in the United Kingdom pursuant to paragraph 317 of the Immigration Rules. In a determination by Judge MR Oliver of the First-tier Tribunal, the appellant’s appeal was dismissed.

 

2.      The appellant applied for permission to appeal which was stated as “granted” by Upper Tribunal Judge Goldstein on 24 November 2014.

 

3.      It is clear from reading the reasons that permission was not granted but was refused.

 

4.      The word “granted” at the beginning of the decision should therefore read “refused”. It is clearly a typographical error. There was no issue that that is the correct position because at the hearing it was not argued otherwise. Therefore there is no valid appeal before me to determine.

 

 

Decision

 

Appeal dismissed

 

 

 

Signed by,

Dated this 12th day of January 2015

A Deputy Judge of the Upper Tribunal

………………………………………

Mrs S Chana

 

 

 

 


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKAITUR/2015/IA476972013.html