BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments >> IA079902014 & ors [2016] UKAITUR IA079902014 (4 January 2016)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKAITUR/2016/IA079902014.html
Cite as: [2016] UKAITUR IA79902014, [2016] UKAITUR IA079902014

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


 

Upper Tribunal

(Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Numbers: IA/07990/2014

IA/07991/2014

IA/07992/2014

 

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS


Heard at Field House

Decision & Reasons Promulgated

On 11 th December 2015

On 4 th January 2016

 

 

 

Before

 

DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE D N HARRIS

 

Between

 

mrs sapumali dayangani perera nelumkatiyage (FIRST APPELLANT)

mr rohana kumarasiri kulathilaka malwanna hewage

(SECOND APPELLANT)

mr malwenna hewage devin sahanjith kulatilaka

(THIRD APPELLANT)

(ANONYMITY DIRECTION not made)

Appellants

 

and

 

THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT

 

Respondent

 

Representation :

 

For the Appellants: No attendance

For the Respondent: Mr N Bramble

 

DECISION AND REASONS

 

1.              The Appellants are citizens of Sri Lanka. Their appeal came before First-tier Tribunal Judge Widdup sitting at Hatton Cross on 26 th September 2014. The Appellants' appeals were dismissed under the Immigration Rules. The Appellants lodged Grounds of Appeal to the Upper Tribunal and First-tier Tribunal Judge Mark Davies refused permission to appeal on 20 th May 2015. The Grounds of Appeal were renewed and those grounds came before Deputy Upper Tribunal Judge Mahmood on 28 th July. It is clear from the reading of those reasons that Judge Mahmood refused permission to appeal. Unfortunately in the head note it states that permission to appeal is granted. I am satisfied that is a typing error.

2.              In such circumstances I am further satisfied that there is consequently no extant appeal before me.

3.              However in addition to that I am provided with copies of correspondence from the Appellant's previously instructed solicitors Nag Law. In that correspondence they note that the Appellants have voluntarily left the UK on 26 th August 2015 and that they are without instructions to represent them. In such circumstances in any event I would find that the Appellant's appeal is abandoned pursuant to Rule 17(a) of the Upper Tribunal Procedure Rules.

4.              This decision is consequently provided for the purpose of clarification.

Notice of Decision

(1) Permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal having been refused both by the First-tier Tribunal and by the Upper Tier Tribunal Judge it is recorded that there is no valid appeal extant before me.

(2) That in recording that the Appellants have voluntarily left the UK on 26 th August 2015 the Appellants' appeal from the decision of the First-tier Tribunal is treated as abandoned.

 

No anonymity direction is made.

 

 

Signed

 

Deputy Upper Tribunal Judge D N Harris

 

TO THE RESPONDENT

FEE AWARD

 

No application is made for a fee award and none is made.

 

 

Signed

 

Deputy Upper Tribunal Judge D N Harris


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKAITUR/2016/IA079902014.html