![]() |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments >> IA117312015 [2016] UKAITUR IA117312015 (7 June 2016) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKAITUR/2016/IA117312015.html Cite as: [2016] UKAITUR IA117312015 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Upper Tribunal
(Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: IA/11731/2015
THE IMMIGRATION ACTS
Heard at Field House |
Decision & Reasons Promulgated |
On 17 May 2016 |
On 7 June 2016 |
|
|
Before
UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE MCGEACHY
Between
oluwafemi samuel adesanya
Appellant
and
THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT
Respondent
Representation :
For the Appellant: Mr K Alim of Messrs Thoree & Co Solicitors
For the Respondent: Mr C Avery, Senior Presenting Officer
DECISION AND DIRECTIONS
1. The appellant, a citizen of Nigeria born on 17 September 1981, appealed against a decision of the respondent refusing him leave to remain under the Immigration (EEA) Regulations 2006 as amended. His appeal was heard by Judge of the First-tier Tribunal Majid and dismissed in a determination promulgated on 5 October 2015.
2. The grounds of appeal argued that there had been procedural unfairness in that the First-tier Judge had stated in the hearing that he was adjourning the appeal for the respondent to consider new evidence when in fact there was no new evidence and also that he had recorded that the appellant had adopted his witness statement when in fact he was not given any opportunity to do so. No relevant issues or law had been considered by the First-tier Judge in arriving at his decision and he had stated that he had upheld the respondent's adverse credibility allegation when no such allegation had been made.
3. In a Rule 24 statement Mr Kotas of the Presenting Officers' Unit accepted that there were material errors of law in the determination and invited the Tribunal to remit the case for a fresh hearing.
4. There are clear errors of law in the determination of the judge in the First-tier as set out in the grounds of appeal and the only appropriate action is to remit this appeal for a hearing afresh in the First-tier Tribunal.
Notice of Decision
This appeal is remitted for hearing afresh in the First-tier Tribunal.
Directions
The appeal will be heard afresh at Taylor House: Time estimate 2 hours.
Signed Date
Upper Tribunal Judge McGeachy 7 th June 2016