United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments

Upper Tribunal

(Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: IA/33528/2014

 

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS

Heard at Centre City Tower Birmingham	Decision & Reasons Promulgated
On 12 th April 2016	On 22 nd April 2016

 

 

Before

 

 

DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE M A HALL

 

 

Between

 

 

the Secretary of State for the home department

Appellant

 

And

 

 

raHila sahebzada

(ANONYMITY DIRECTION not made)

Respondent

 

Representation :

 

For the Appellant: Mr D Mills, Senior Home Office Presenting Officer

For the Respondent: Mr R Ahmed of Counsel instructed by Harbans Singh Solicitors

 

DECISION AND REASONS

1.              The Secretary of State appeals against a decision of Judge Buckwell of the First-tier Tribunal (the FtT) promulgated on 20 ^th November 2014.

2.              The Respondent before the Upper Tribunal was the Appellant before the FtT and I will refer to her as the Claimant.

3.              The Claimant is a female citizen of Afghanistan born 10 ^th May 1980 who was granted entry clearance to the United Kingdom as the spouse of Mohammad Daud Sahebzadah (the Sponsor) who is a British citizen.

4.              On 5 ^th June 2014 the Claimant applied for further leave to remain as the Sponsor's spouse.

5.              On 14 ^th August 2014 the Secretary of State refused the application as the Claimant had failed to provide an English language test certificate as required by paragraph 284(ix)(a) of the Immigration Rules.

6.              The Claimant appealed to the FtT. By the time the FtT hearing took place, the Claimant had obtained an English language certificate at Level A1 of the CEFR. The FtT decided that as this certificate had not been considered by the Secretary of State, it was appropriate to find the Secretary of State's decision not in accordance with the law, and therefore the Claimant's application remained outstanding before the Secretary of State, so that the English language certificate could be considered.

7.              The Secretary of State applied for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal. The grounds relied upon Appendix FM-SE paragraph D which states that the initial decision maker will only consider documents submitted with the application unless certain exceptions apply, which the Secretary of State contended did not apply in this case.

8.              Permission to appeal was granted on 15 ^th January 2015.

9.              At the hearing before the Upper Tribunal Mr Mills conceded that the decision of the FtT disclosed no error of law, and accepted that the application made by the Secretary of State was flawed, in placing reliance upon Appendix FM-SE, as this was an application that was considered pursuant to paragraph 284, and Appendix FM-SE was not relevant. Mr Mills accepted that the decision of the FtT must stand.

10.          In view of the concession made on behalf of the Secretary of State, I find no error of law was made by the FtT. The decision of the FtT stands, and it is now for the Secretary of State to consider the English language test certificate, the original of which is held by the Sponsor, and should be submitted to the Secretary of State.

Notice of Decision

 

The making of the decision of the FtT did not involve the making of an error on a point of law such that the decision must be set aside. I do not set aside the decision. The appeal of the Secretary of State is dismissed.

 

Anonymity

 

No anonymity direction was made by the FtT. There has been no request for anonymity made to the Upper Tribunal and no anonymity order is made.

 

Signed Date: 13 ^th April 2016

Deputy Upper Tribunal Judge M A Hall

 

TO THE RESPONDENT

FEE AWARD

 

As the decision of the FtT stands, so does the decision not to make a fee award.

 

Signed Date: 13 ^th April 2016

Deputy Upper Tribunal Judge M A Hall