United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments

 

 

Upper Tribunal

(Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: HU/03958/2015

 

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS

Heard at North Shields	Decision & Reasons Promulgated
On 11 th October, 2017	On 19 th October, 2017

 

 

Before

 

UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE CHALKLEY

 

Between

 

Mahmoud ali m aleraig

(ANONYMITY DIRECTION not made)

Appellant

and

 

THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT

 

Respondent

 

 

Representation :

 

For the Appellant: Mr Marfat of Newcastle Legal Centre

For the Respondent: Mr D Mills, Home Office Presenting Officer

 

 

DECISION AND REASONS

 

 

1.              The appellant was born on 15 ^th August 1974 and is a Libyan citizen.

 

2.              On 3 ^rd July, 2015 the respondent refused to grant the appellant leave to remain in the United Kingdom and the appellant appealed to the First-tier Tribunal. His appeal was heard by First-tier Tribunal Judge Howard on 2 ^nd September 2016. The appellant, dissatisfied with the judge's decision to refuse to allow his appeal, sought and obtained permission to challenge it.

 

3.              The matter was called for hearing before me today when, on behalf of the Secretary of State, Mr Mills invited me to allow the appeal outright, given the errors in the determination, which were accepted. This determination appears as a matter of record only.

 

4.              The appellant's appeal is allowed under the immigration rules.

 

 

 

Direction Regarding Anonymity - Rule 14 of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008

 

The First-tier Tribunal made an anonymity direction under Rule 13 of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Rules 2014. I have decided not to continue the anonymity direction, there being no basis for doing so.

 

 

 

Richard Chalkley

Upper Tribunal Judge Chalkley

 

 

TO THE RESPONDENT

FEE AWARD

 

I have allowed the appeal and to the extent that any fee has been paid, I order that it should be repaid to the appellant.

 

 

 

Richard Chalkley

Upper Tribunal Judge Chalkley