BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments >> EA018732016 [2018] UKAITUR EA018732016 (27 March 2018)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKAITUR/2018/EA018732016.html
Cite as: [2018] UKAITUR EA18732016, [2018] UKAITUR EA018732016

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


 

Upper Tribunal

Immigration and Asylum Chamber Appeal Number: EA/01873/2016

 

 

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS

 

 

Heard at Field House

Decision and Reasons Promulgated

On 22 March 2018

On 27 March 2018

 

 

 

Before

 

Upper Tribunal Judge Kekić

 

 

Between

 

Ahsan Rasul

(anonymity order not made)

Appellant

and

 

Secretary of State for the Home Department

Respondent

 

 

Representation

For the Appellant: Mr A Maqsood, of Counsel, instructed by Lamptons Solicitors

For the Respondent: Mr S Walker, Senior Home Office Presenting Officer

 

 

Determination and Reasons

Details of appellant and basis of claim

1. The First-tier Tribunal (Judge S J Clarke) found that the Tribunal had no jurisdiction to hear the appellant's appeal against the decision of the respondent to refuse him a residence card as an extended family member under the EEA Regulations. He applied the decision in Sala [2016] UKUT 411 (IAC) in support of his decision.

2. The appellant is a Pakistani national born on 6 July 1987 and his EEA sponsor is his father-in-law. Initially his application for permission to appeal against the Tribunal's decision was refused (on 12 December 2017 by First-tier Tribunal Judge Boyes) but on renewal it was granted by Upper Tribunal Judge Grubb on 22 January 2018. Judge Grubb found that following Khan [2017] EWCA Civ 1755, the First-tier Tribunal had been wrong in law to conclude that it had no jurisdiction. He proposed to set aside the decision and remit the appeal to the First-tier Tribunal unless either of the parties objected within 7 days of that decision.

Consideration

3. The parties confirmed at the hearing before me that they had no objections to the course of action proposed by Upper Tribunal Judge Grubb. As no objections have been raised, I therefore proceed to set aside the determination of the First-tier Tribunal Judge and remit it back to another judge of that Tribunal for a fresh hearing and the re-making of the decision.

Decision

4. The First-tier Tribunal made an error of law. The decision is set aside. The matter is remitted to the First-tier Tribunal for a hearing and for the decision to be re-made.

Anonymity Order

5. I was not asked to make an order for anonymity and see no reason to do so in any event.

Directions

6. All additional documentary evidence relied on by the parties must be filed and served no later than seven working days prior to the hearing.

 

 

Signed:

Dr R Kekić

Judge of the Upper Tribunal 

 

22 March 2018


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKAITUR/2018/EA018732016.html