BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments >> EA127362016 & EA067822017 [2018] UKAITUR EA127362016 (19 March 2018) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKAITUR/2018/EA127362016.html Cite as: [2018] UKAITUR EA127362016 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Upper Tribunal
(Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Numbers: EA/12736/2016
EA/06782/2017
THE IMMIGRATION ACTS
Determined at Field House |
Determination Promulgated |
On 16 th February 2018 |
On 19 th March 2018 |
|
|
Before
DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE SAINI
Between
Miss Weronika Elzbieta Jendrzejewska
Mr Amro Aly Youssef Hussein Habka
(ANONYMITY DIRECTION NOT MADE )
Appellants
and
THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT
Respondent
Representation :
For the Appellants: Mr C Lam, Solicitor: David Tang & Co
For the Respondent: Mr S Walker, Senior Presenting Officer
DECISION BY CONSENT AND DIRECTIONS
Determination by Consent
1. Pursuant to Rule 39 of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008 and by the consent of the parties the following order is made:
Upon the parties' agreement that the decision of the First-tier Tribunal promulgated on 7 th November 2017 discloses a material error of law, it is hereby ordered by consent as follows:
(1) the First-tier Tribunal Judge made errors of law in relation to the assessment of the issue of a marriage of convenience. The essence of the error being that the judge solely considered the Islamic marriage which took place in November 2015 between the EEA Sponsor and a third country national rather than considering the civil marriage ceremony which took place in 2017 - that being the formalisation of the relationship between the European national and third country national - which would be the relevant marriage when gauging whether a marriage of convenience exists against the EEA Regulations and the European Directive on Free Movement;
(2) in addition to the identified Grounds of Appeal, I further note the judge did not make reference to the most relevant authority from the Upper Tribunal, which would have been of assistance to her/him, that being Papajorgji [2012] UKUT 38 which appends the EU Commission Guidance on marriages of convenince to that reported decision,
(3) the matter is to be remitted to be heard by a Judge of the First-tier Tribunal other than Judge Buchanan.
2. The Appellants' appeal to the Upper Tribunal is therefore allowed.
3. The decision of the First-tier Tribunal is set aside for legal error by consent.
Deputy Upper Tribunal Judge Saini