![]() |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments >> HU100982016 [2018] UKAITUR HU100982016 (3 October 2018) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKAITUR/2018/HU100982016.html Cite as: [2018] UKAITUR HU100982016 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Upper Tribunal
(Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: HU/10098/2016
THE IMMIGRATION ACTS
Heard at Glasgow |
Determination & Reasons Promulgated |
on 28 September 2018 |
on 03 October 2018 |
|
|
Before
UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE MACLEMAN
Between
MAIMOONA KHURSHID
Appellant
and
ENTRY CLEARANCE OFFICER, Pakistan
Respondent
For the Appellant: Mr Sharma, Work Permit Services Ltd
For the Respondent: Mr A Govan, Senior Home Office Presenting Officer
DETERMINATION AND REASONS
1. This decision is to be read with:
(i) The respondent's decision dated 24 March 2016, refusing the appellant's application for entry clearance as a spouse.
(ii) The appellant's grounds of appeal to the First-tier Tribunal.
(iii) The decision of FtT Judge Clough, promulgated on 13 February 2018.
(iv) The appellant's grounds of appeal to the UT, stated in the application for permission dated 23 February 2018.
(v) The grant of permission by FtT Judge Page, dated 26 April 2018.
2. Mr Govan confirmed that the respondent's decision accepts that the requirements of the immigration rules, apart from the requirement for a "genuine and subsisting relationship", were met. He accepted that paragraphs 10 and 11 of the FtT's decision are to the effect that such a relationship was established, and that the decision fell to be reversed.
3. The appeal was on human rights grounds only, but the immigration rules in respect of family life were the starting point, and that part of the rules is designed to comply with article 8. On her findings about the relationship, the judge had no reason to look for exceptional circumstances beyond the terms of the rules.
4. The decision of the FtT is set aside, and the following decision is substituted: the appeal, as brought to the FtT, is allowed.
5. No anonymity direction has been requested or made.
28 September 2018
Upper Tribunal Judge Macleman