![]() |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments >> PA099672016 [2018] UKAITUR PA099672016 (26 July 2018) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKAITUR/2018/PA099672016.html Cite as: [2018] UKAITUR PA099672016, [2018] UKAITUR PA99672016 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Upper Tribunal
(Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: PA/09967/2016
THE IMMIGRATION ACTS
Heard at Field House |
Decision & Reasons Promulgated | |
On 17 July 2018 |
On 26 July 2018 | |
|
| |
Before
THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE LEWIS
UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE KEBEDE
Between
haider [M]
(ANONYMITY DIRECTION not made)
Appellant
and
THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT
Respondent
Representation :
For the Appellant: Miss J Bond, Counsel instructed by Leonard Canning Solicitors
For the Respondent: Ms Z Ahmad, Home Office Presenting Officer
DECISION AND REASONS
1. This is an appeal against the decision of the First-tier Tribunal, Judge Chana, promulgated on 27 July 2017. The appellant is an Iranian national. He came to the United Kingdom and claimed asylum and humanitarian protection. That claim was refused by the Secretary of State for the Home Department and there was an appeal.
2. In the course of the appellant's decision at paragraph 79 an issue arose as to whether or not the Iranian authorities had blocked access to websites in Iran and the judge considered that was not the case and that that matter affected the credibility of the appellant's claim as to what information he had given to his sister. That forms ground 1 of the notice of appeal where it is said that the First-tier Tribunal erred by basing key findings on speculation without any evidential foundation.
3. Permission was granted on all grounds but the judge granting permission noted in particular that it was arguable that there was no evidential basis upon which the judge could have presumed that the Iranian authorities had blocked access to websites.
4. Both parties are now in a position where they agree that there was an error on the part of the Tribunal below. They both agree that the appeal should be allowed, the decision set aside and the matter remitted to the First-tier Tribunal for reconsideration.
Notice of Decision
5. We therefore allow the appeal, set aside the decision and remit the matter to the First-tier Tribunal.
6. No anonymity direction is made.
Signed Date: 20 July 2018
pp
Mr Justice Lewis