United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments

 

Upper Tribunal

(Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: HU/02599/2018

 

 

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS

 

 

Heard at Field House	Decision & Reasons Promulgated
On 7 January 2019	On 24 January 2019

 

Before

 

DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE SHERIDAN

 

 

Between

 

the Secretary of State for the Home Department

Appellant

and

 

Nkechiweta Martha Chidi Chidi

(no ANONYMITY DIRECTION made)

Respondent

 

 

Representation :

For the Appellant: Mr L Tarlow, Home Office Presenting Officer

For the Respondent: Mr S Sayeed, Counsel instructed by Wesley Gryk Solicitors

 

 

DECISION AND REASONS

1.              This is an appeal by the Secretary of State against the decision of Judge of the First-tier Tribunal Paul to allow the respondent's appeal against the decision to refuse her application for leave to remain in the UK on the basis of her family life with her spouse.

2.              At the First-tier Tribunal hearing, the judge did not permit oral evidence to be given by the respondent, her husband or her mother-in-law.

3.              In the grounds of appeal the Secretary of State contends that failing to allow cross-examination of the aforementioned witnesses was a procedural error which prevented the Presenting Officer from fully engaging with and examining the evidence.

4.              In the respondent's Rule 24 response it is agreed that there was procedural unfairness in how the hearing in the First-tier Tribunal was conducted.

5.              At the error of law hearing the parties informed me that they were in agreement that the decision of the First-tier Tribunal should be set aside on the basis that there was procedural unfairness in how the judge conducted the hearing. Both parties submitted that the appeal should be remitted to the First-tier Tribunal to be heard afresh.

6.              In light of the agreement between the parties that there has been procedural unfairness and that the appeal should be remitted to the First-tier Tribunal, I will set aside the decision and remit the appeal to the First-tier Tribunal to be heard by a different judge with no findings preserved.

Notice of Decision

7.              The decision of the First-tier Tribunal contains a material error of law and is set aside.

8.              The appeal is remitted to the First-tier Tribunal to be heard by a judge other than Judge N M Paul.

9.              No anonymity direction is made.

 

Signed
Deputy Upper Tribunal Judge Sheridan	Dated:21 January 2019