![]() |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments >> HU185122018 & Ors. [2021] UKAITUR HU185122018 (10 June 2021) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKAITUR/2021/HU185122018.html Cite as: [2021] UKAITUR HU185122018 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Upper Tribunal
(Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Numbers: HU/18512/2018
HU/18910/2018, HU/18915/2018
HU/18921/2018, HU/18929/2018
THE IMMIGRATION ACTS
Heard at Field House |
Decision & Reasons Promulgated |
On 26 May 2021 |
On 10 June 2021 |
(remote hearing) |
|
Before
UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE SHERIDAN
Between
MUHAMMAD [A]
KHADIJA [A]
IQRA [A]
DANISH [A]
[M B A]
(ANONYMITY DIRECTIOn not made)
Appellants
and
THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT
Respondent
Representation
For the Appellants: Ms M Tariq, Counsel instructed by Immigration Law Chambers
For the Respondent: Mr P Deller, Senior Home Office Presenting Officer
This has been a remote hearing to which both parties have consented. The form of remote hearing was video by Microsoft Teams (V). A face to face hearing was not held because it was not practicable and all issues could be determined in a remote hearing. I did not experience any difficulties, and neither party expressed any concern, with the process.
CONSENT ORDER
Background
1. The decision of the First-tier Tribunal was set aside by a decision of the Upper Tribunal promulgated on 8 March 2021.
2. At the hearing to re-make the decision, Mr Deller conceded that the appeal of the appellants should be allowed on Article 8 grounds.
3. The parties agreed (and there is no reason why it is inappropriate) to dispose of the proceedings by way of a consent order.
Decision
4. Pursuant to Rule 39 of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008 and by the consent of the parties I make the following order:
5. The appeal of the appellants against the decision of the respondent to refuse their human rights claims is allowed.
Signed
D. Sheridan
|
Dated: 26 May 2021 |
Upper Tribunal Judge Sheridan |
|
|
|