![]() |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments >> HU000432021 & HU023052021 [2022] UKAITUR HU000432021 (20 April 2022) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKAITUR/2022/HU000432021.html Cite as: [2022] UKAITUR HU000432021, [2022] UKAITUR HU432021 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
A picture containing text
Description automatically generated
Upper Tribunal
(Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Numbers
HU/00043/2021 [UI-2021-000867]
HU/02305/2021 [UI-2021-000868]
THE IMMIGRATION ACTS
Heard at Field House |
Decision & Reasons Promulgated |
On the 28 February 2022 |
On the 20 April 2022 |
|
|
Before
UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE SHERIDAN
DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE CHAPMAN
Between
MOHAMAD ABDULLA MOHAMED
AHMAD ABDALLA MOHAMED
(ANONYMITY DIRECTIOn NOT MADE)
Appellant
and
ENTRY CLEARANCE OFFICER
Respondent
Representation
For the Appellant: Ms M Butler, Counsel instructed by Anglia Immigration Law
For the Respondent: Ms A Everett, Senior Home Office Presenting Officer
CONSENT ORDER
Background
1. The appellants are appealing against a decision of Judge of the First-tier Tribunal Chana ("the judge") promulgated on 24 August 2021 dismissing their human rights appeal.
2. At the error of law hearing, Ms Everett, on behalf of the respondent, conceded that the grounds established that the decision of the judge involved the making of errors of law such that the decision could not stand. Ms Everett and Ms Butler were in agreement that the appeal should be remitted to the First-tier Tribunal to be decided afresh by a different judge with no findings preserved.
3. The parties agreed to dispose of the proceedings by way of a consent order.
Decision
4. Pursuant to Rules 39 and 40(3) of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008 we make the following order:
5. The decision of the First-tier Tribunal is set aside and the appeal is remitted to the First-tier Tribunal to be made afresh by a different judge with no findings preserved.
Signed
D. Sheridan
|
|
Upper Tribunal Judge Sheridan |
Dated: 7 March 2022 |