BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments >> UI2023000514 & UI2023000515 [2023] UKAITUR UI2023000514 (10 October 2023)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKAITUR/2023/UI2023000514.html
Cite as: [2023] UKAITUR UI2023000514

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


IN THE UPPER TRIBUNAL

IMMIGRATION AND ASYLUM CHAMBER

UI-2023-000514 & UI-2023-000515

 

FtT No's: EA/03752 & 05566/2022

 

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS

 

Decision & Reasons Issued:

On 10 th of October 2023

 

 

Before

 

UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE MACLEMAN

 

Between

 

L & F SHKIRA

(no anonymity order)

Appellants

and

 

S S H D

 

Respondent

Heard at Edinburgh on 4 October 2023

 

For the Appellant: Mr H Ndubuisi, of Drummond Miller, Solicitors

For the Respondent: Mr M Diwyncz, Senior Home Office Presenting Officer

 

DECISION AND REASONS

 

1.              This is an appeal against the decision of FtT Judge Prudham, promulgated on 19 January 2023.

 

2.              Case law has moved on since then. Mr Ndubuisi founded on Rexhaj (dependent parents, assumed dependency) [2023] UKUT 161, which is headnoted thus:

 


1. Where an applicant:

 

a. has been granted entry clearance as a dependent parent under Appendix EU (Family Permit); and
b. is subsequently granted limited leave to enter at the border as a dependent parent,

the operative basis upon which the individual was granted leave to enter at the border is to be found within Appendix EU.


2. It follows that such an applicant will already have been granted leave as a dependent parent under Appendix EU (c.f. "under this Appendix") and, pursuant to the definition of "dependent parent" in Annex 1 to Appendix EU at paragraph (c)(i), will not be subject to the requirement to establish dependency.

 

3.              Mr Diwyncz offered no argument against the application of that decision.

 

4.              It is unnecessary to decide whether there was any error by the FtT in resolving the case as it was presented to it, and as the law was then understood. It is now clear that, although on subsequent authority, the decision should have turned on the prior grants of entry clearance and of limited leave to enter.

 

5.              The decision of the FtT is set aside. The appeals, as originally brought to the FtT, are allowed.

 

6.              No anonymity order has been requested or made.

 

Hugh Macleman

Judge of the Upper Tribunal, Immigration and Asylum Chamber

4 October 2023

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKAITUR/2023/UI2023000514.html