BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments >> UI2023004753 & UI2023004754 [2023] UKAITUR UI2023004753 (15 December 2023) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKAITUR/2023/UI2023004753.html Cite as: [2023] UKAITUR UI2023004753 |
||
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
|
IMMIGRATION AND ASYLUM CHAMBER |
Case No . : UI-2023-004753 UI-2023-004754 First-tier Tribunal No: HU/5850/2022 HU59851/2022 |
THE IMMIGRATION ACTS
Decision & Reasons Issued:
On the 15 December 2023
Before
DEPUTY JUDGE of the UPPER tribunal McCARTHY
Between
MMK
FMK
(anonymity direction made)
Appellant
and
entry clearance officer - sheffield
Respondent
Representation :
For the Appellant: Mr R Spurling, instructed by Times PBS
For the Respondent: Ms H Gilmour, Home Office Presenting Officer
Heard at Field House on 8 December 2023
Order Regarding Anonymity
Pursuant to rule 14 of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008, the appellants and any member of their family is granted anonymity. Failure to comply with this order could amount to a contempt of court . No-one shall publish or reveal any information, including the name or address of the appellants, likely to lead members of the public to identify the appellants or any member of their family.
DECISION AND REASONS
1. The appellants appeal with permission granted by First-tier Tribunal Judge Hollings-Tennant, against the decision of First-tier Tribunal Judge Chana, that was promulgated on 13/09/2023.
2. This was a hybrid hearing at the request of the Presenting Officer. There were no connectivity difficulties.
3. At the start of the hearing, Ms Gilmour informed me that the ECO no longer opposes the appeal because it is accepted there are contradictory findings in the decision regarding whether family life existed between the appellants and sponsor.
4. The parties agreed that the appeal needed to be remitted to the First-tier Tribunal for a fresh hearing and nothing is preserved from the
5. The parties agreed that the appeal needed to be remitted to the First-tier Tribunal for a fresh hearing and nothing is preserved from the appealed decision.
Notice of Decision
The decision under appeal contains legal error and is set aside.
I remit the appeal to be heard afresh in the First-tier Tribunal by a judge other than Judge Chana.
Judge John McCarthy
Deputy Judge of the Upper Tribunal
Date:
