BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments >> UI2024003212 [2025] UKAITUR UI2024003212 (4 March 2025)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKAITUR/2025/UI2024003212.html
Cite as: [2025] UKAITUR UI2024003212

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


A black background with a black square Description automatically generated with medium confidence

 

IN THE UPPER TRIBUNAL

IMMIGRATION AND ASYLUM CHAMBER

Case No: UI-2024-003212

First-tier Tribunal No: HU/01466/2023

 

 

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS

Decision & Reasons Issued:

 

On 4 th of March 2025

 

 

Before

 

UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE LANE

 

 

Between

 

MIRRIAM RUTH MATSUKA

(NO ANONYMITY ORDER MADE)

Appellant

and

 

Secretary of State for the Home Department

Respondent

Representation:

 

For the Appellant: Mr Semega-Janeh

For the Respondent: Ms Arif, Senior Presenting Officer

 

Heard at Birmingham Civil Justice Centre on 11 November 2024

 

 

DECISION AND REASONS

 

1.       The appellant is a female citizen of Malawi born on 20 June 1982. She appealed to the First-tier Tribunal against a decision of the Secretary of State dated 14 July 2023 refusing her human rights claim on the basis of her family life with Richard Scott Stubbs, a British citizen. The First-tier Tribunal in a decision promulgated on 17 May 2024, dismissed the appeal.

 

2.       This appeal turns on the matter of the filing of various documents by the parties at the First-tier Tribunal and whether these documents were before the judge who determined the appeal on the papers and/or whether the judge was aware of the existence of documents but chose to proceed without having sight of them.

 

3.       I have read the grounds carefully together with the Rule 24 and 25 responses. I have considered the oral submissions of Ms Arif, for the Secretary of State, and Mr Semega-Janeh, for the appellant. I find that the decision of the judge is vitiated because he did not have regard to documents relevant to the appeal which had been filed at the Tribunal in accordance with the rules or chose to proceed in the absence of such documents. In either case, I find that the decision of the First-tier Tribunal should be set aside. The decision will be remade in the First-tier Tribunal at Manchester. The appellant shall file and serve a comprehensive bundle of documents no later than 10 days before the First-tier Tribunal hearing.

Notice of Decision

The decision of the First-tier Tribunal promulgated on 17 May 2024 is set aside. None of the findings of fact shall stand. The appeal shall be returned to the First-tier Tribunal for that Tribunal to remake the decision following a hearing de novo at Manchester on the first available date.

 

Listing Directions

 

1.       Remit to Manchester Hearing Centre

2.       Not before Judge Thorne

3.       2 hours.

4.       First available date

5.       No interpreter

 

C. N. Lane

 

Judge of the Upper Tribunal

Immigration and Asylum Chamber

 

Dated: 12 February 2025

 


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKAITUR/2025/UI2024003212.html