BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal >> Mensah v East Hertfordshire NHS Trust [1996] UKEAT 1259_95_1305 (13 May 1996)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/1996/1259_95_1305.html
Cite as: [1996] UKEAT 1259_95_1305

[New search] [Help]


    BAILII case number: [1996] UKEAT 1259_95_1305

    Appeal No. EAT/1259/95

    EMPOLYMENT APPEAL TRIBUNAL

    58 VICTORIA EMBANKMENT, LONDON EC4Y 0DS

    At the Tribunal

    On 13th May 1996

    THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE BUTTERFIELD

    MRS R CHAPMAN

    MR A C BLYGHTON


    MRS E MENSAH          APPELLANT

    EAST HERTFORDSHIRE NHS TRUST          RESPONDENTS


    Transcript of Proceedings

    JUDGMENT

    PRELIMINARY HEARING - EX PARTE

    Revised


     

    APPEARANCES

    For the Appellant MR P DOUGHTY

    (of Counsel) appearing under the Employment Law Appeal Advice Scheme


     

    MR JUSTICE BUTTERFIELD: With some hesitation and without encouraging the appellant to expect that in due course she will succeed in this appeal, we have determined that it is appropriate to grant leave in this case, and that the matter should go forward to a full hearing before Employment Appeal Tribunal.

    The single point on which we have been persuaded that there is an arguable error of law in the decision of the Industrial Tribunal, relates to the issue of the appellant's contact with the respondents in relation to the vacancies at the neonatal unit as opposed to the vacancies in the maternity unit. It is plain in our judgment that the findings of fact made in relation to the application for employment in the maternity unit are such that no arguable point is disclosed. However, bearing in mind the absence of any reference to the appellant's application in respect of vacancies at the neonatal unit and the silence of the tribunal's decision on that point, we consider on that ground alone that there is an arguable ground of appeal.

    We give you leave, if advised, to amend the Notice of Appeal to clarify precisely the point in issue.


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/1996/1259_95_1305.html