BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal >> Thomas Pink Ltd v Fernandez [1997] UKEAT 982_97_2511 (25 November 1997)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/1997/982_97_2511.html
Cite as: [1997] UKEAT 982_97_2511

[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]


BAILII case number: [1997] UKEAT 982_97_2511
Appeal No. EAT/982/97

EMPLOYMENT APPEAL TRIBUNAL
58 VICTORIA EMBANKMENT, LONDON EC4Y 0DS
             At the Tribunal
             On 25 November 1997

Before

HIS HONOUR JUDGE B HARGROVE QC

MR J D DALY

MISS S M WILSON



THOMAS PINK LTD APPELLANT

MISS M FERNANDEZ RESPONDENT


Transcript of Proceedings

JUDGMENT

PRELIMINARY HEARING

© Copyright 1997


    APPEARANCES

     

    For the Appellants MR H BALLANTYNE
    Representative
    Mr W Mellor
    Head of Human Resources
    Thomas Pink Ltd
    1 Havelock Terrace
    London SW8 4AF
       


     

    JUDGE B HARGROVE QC: We have considered this matter. We are of the view that it would be correct to allow this matter to proceed to a full hearing upon the basis of the matters set forth at vi. a,b and c of the grounds of appeal.

    In relation to the question of perversity, it seems to us that there are only two valid points. The first is that the Tribunal appears to have taken no account of the fact that the Appellant has the legal duty towards the Airport Authority and hence the errors became of somewhat more importance in the selling of goods and the second that there is no reference to the fact that the Respondent was taken through the till procedure again by an expert in order to demonstrate that it was not an error in the till but an error in his operation. Those are the only two points on which we think there is anything by way of perversity to be argued and it is, therefore, only upon those two points that we shall order Chairman's notes in those two areas and no more.

    There will also be an order that skeleton arguments on both sides should be filed and exchanged 28 days before the hearing and there is a time estimate of one day, category C.


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/1997/982_97_2511.html