BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal >> Newcastle Youth Congress v Malik [1998] UKEAT 100_98_1006 (10 June 1998)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/1998/100_98_1006.html
Cite as: [1998] UKEAT 100_98_1006

[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]


BAILII case number: [1998] UKEAT 100_98_1006
Appeal No. EAT/100/98

EMPLOYMENT APPEAL TRIBUNAL
58 VICTORIA EMBANKMENT, LONDON EC4Y 0DS
             At the Tribunal
             On 10 June 1998

Before

HIS HONOUR JUDGE PETER CLARK

MRS E HART

MR J C SHRIGLEY



NEWCASTLE YOUTH CONGRESS APPELLANT

MR ABDUL MALIK RESPONDENT


Transcript of Proceedings

JUDGMENT

PRELIMINARY HEARING

© Copyright 1998


    APPEARANCES

     

    For the Appellants





    NO APPEARANCE BY
    OR REPRESENTATION
    ON BEHALF OF
    THE APPELLANTS/
    THE RESPONDENT
    For the Respondent  


     

    JUDGE PETER CLARK: This is an appeal by the Newcastle Youth Congress against a decision of the Newcastle Upon Tyne Industrial Tribunal that the employee, Mr Malik, was unfairly constructively dismissed. At a subsequent remedies hearing the Tribunal awarded him compensation totalling £5,417.79.

    The notice of appeal was settled by solicitors, Short Richardson & Forth, of Newcastle. The case having been listed for a preliminary hearing before us today, those solicitors wrote to the Registrar on 26 May 1998 indicating that they were without instructions and no longer acted for the Appellant, whom they understood had ceased their activities at their former premises at 262 Westgate Road, Newcastle upon Tyne.

    Following receipt of that letter the Registrar wrote to the Appellant at that address on 29 May enclosing a copy of the letter from their solicitors and asking whether they would let the EAT know as a matter of urgency whether it was the Appellant's intention to continue with the appeal.

    No response was received to that letter and this morning we have put this case to the back of our list. There has been no appearance and no communication from the Appellant. It is incumbent upon an Appellant to pursue his appeal. In the absence of any indication from the Appellant in this case that it wishes to do so, we have no alternative but to dismiss the appeal at this preliminary hearing stage.


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/1998/100_98_1006.html