BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal >> Messier-Dowty Ltd v. Butler [1999] UKEAT 713_99_2810 (28 October 1999)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/1999/713_99_2810.html
Cite as: [1999] UKEAT 713_99_2810

[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]


BAILII case number: [1999] UKEAT 713_99_2810
Appeal No. EAT/713/99

EMPLOYMENT APPEAL TRIBUNAL
58 VICTORIA EMBANKMENT, LONDON EC4Y 0DS
             At the Tribunal
             On 28 October 1999

Before

THE HONOURABLE LORD JOHNSTON

MR L D COWAN

MR D J JENKINS MBE



MESSIER-DOWTY LTD APPELLANT

MR B BUTLER RESPONDENT


Transcript of Proceedings

JUDGMENT

PRELIMINARY HEARING – EX PARTE

© Copyright 1999


    APPEARANCES

     

    For the Appellants MR R CLAYTON
    (of Counsel)
    Instructed by:
    Mr R Linskell
    Legal Adviser
    Engineering Employers Federation
    Broadway House
    Tothill Street
    London
    SW1H 9NQ
       


     

    LORD JOHNSTON: This is a preliminary hearing to an appeal by the employer against the finding of an Employment Tribunal that the respondent employee had been unfairly dismissed.

  1. For the purposes of the present hearing the substance of the issues do not matter, in as much that the only question raised was effectively that in paragraph 9 of the Employment Tribunal's decision, which states, paraphrasing it, that the employer had indicated that it would follow its disciplinary procedure in investigating what was a capability question but had not done so.
  2. Mr Clayton submitted to us that he had searched in vein in the decision to find on what basis the procedure had not been properly followed, and indeed, of what basis or what difference it would have made if that was in fact the case.
  3. With this we entirely agree. We consider that on the face of it, there is a substantial argument that the decision of the Employment Tribunal is defective for want of reasons to support its decision in paragraph 9 and we allow the matter to go to a full hearing on that basis.


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/1999/713_99_2810.html