BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal >> Abegaze v. British Telecommunications Plc [1999] UKEAT 757_99_1507 (15 July 1999)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/1999/757_99_1507.html
Cite as: [1999] UKEAT 757_99_1507

[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]


BAILII case number: [1999] UKEAT 757_99_1507
Appeal No. EAT/757/99

EMPLOYMENT APPEAL TRIBUNAL
58 VICTORIA EMBANKMENT, LONDON EC4Y 0DS
             At the Tribunal
             On 15 July 1999

Before

HIS HONOUR JUDGE D M LEVY QC

MRS R CHAPMAN

MR S M SPRINGER MBE



DR A ABEGAZE APPELLANT

BRITISH TELECOMMUNICATIONS PLC RESPONDENT


Transcript of Proceedings

JUDGMENT

INTERLOCUTORY HEARING

© Copyright 1999


    APPEARANCES

     

    For the Appellants MR A GUMBITI-ZIMUTO
    (of Counsel)
    Instructed By:
    Mr S Saggar
    Messrs Johns & Saggar
    Solicitors
    193-195 Kentish Town Road
    London NW5 2JU
    For the Respondents MISS N JOFFE
    (of Counsel)
    Instructed By:
    Ms E Gray
    Solicitor
    Group Legal Services,
    Employment Law Team
    British Telecommunications Plc
    BT Centre
    81 Newgate Street
    London EC1A 7AJ


     

    JUDGE LEVY: We have before us today an appeal by Dr Abegaze in which British Telecommunications Plc were the Respondent.

  1. They are rather complicated proceedings and in the events which have happened, it is probable that the less we say about them the better. In effect, Counsel have agreed the way in which the matter should proceed hereafter in the Employment Tribunal without asking us to decide any of the matters which are brought on appeal.
  2. In the circumstances, as Counsel had suggested, save for Legal Aid Taxation of the Appellant's cost, we wish to make no order on the appeal. The order will contain recitals on which Counsel are agreed but have not completely formulated at this stage of the afternoon.
  3. We will therefore, by consent, make that order on the appeal and give Counsel liberty to lodge an agreed minute of order showing the understandings which they have reached and the invitation which they will be extending to the Employment Tribunal to further the hearing of the Applicant's complaint so that it will reach a final determination in the Employment Tribunal with as least delay as possible.
  4. We congratulate the parties and their Counsel for compromising the appeal in the way they have today, which we suspect has saved us, if not them, several hours of labour.


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/1999/757_99_1507.html