BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal >> Bold Transmission Parts Ltd v. Taree [2000] UKEAT 1030_00_0510 (5 October 2000)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/2000/1030_00_0510.html
Cite as: [2000] UKEAT 1030_00_0510, [2000] UKEAT 1030__510

[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]


BAILII case number: [2000] UKEAT 1030_00_0510
Appeal No. EAT/1030/00

EMPLOYMENT APPEAL TRIBUNAL
58 VICTORIA EMBANKMENT, LONDON EC4Y 0DS
             At the Tribunal
             On 5 October 2000

Before

HIS HONOUR JUDGE J R REID QC

MR B V FITZGERALD

MR G H WRIGHT MBE



BOLD TRANSMISSION PARTS LTD APPELLANT

MR D TAREE RESPONDENT


Transcript of Proceedings

JUDGMENT

PRELIMINARY HEARING

© Copyright 2000


    APPEARANCES

     

    For the Appellant MR L LOW
    (Managing Director)
    Bold Transmission Parts Ltd
    Webber Road
    Kirkby Industrial Estate
    Liverpool L33 7SW
       


     

    JUDGE REID QC

  1. This is a preliminary hearing, ex parte, in an appeal by Bold Transmission Parts Ltd against a decision of the Employment Tribunal held on 28 June 2000 in Liverpool, whereby it awarded holiday pay to Mr Taree who was the Applicant before that Tribunal.
  2. Mr Taree had unhappily been injured at work, and had in fact, not been at work since August 1997. In those circumstances, Bold Transmission took the view that he was not entitled to any holiday pay.
  3. The simple question, and it is simple to pose, though not to answer, is whether in the circumstances, Mr Taree was entitled to holiday pay. The Employment Tribunal held that he was; in doing so, they differed in law from another Employment Tribunal. The Chairman of the Tribunal in this case indicated that the case was not an easy one, and in effect invited the Respondent before the Tribunal, that is, Bold Transmission, to appeal, which they have done.
  4. In our judgment, the point is one of importance: it is a point on which there are now conflicting decisions of two Employment Tribunals, and the sooner a comparatively authoritative decision is given, the better. In those circumstances, we propose to order that the matter should go ahead to a full hearing.


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/2000/1030_00_0510.html