BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal >> Bates v Powertech Design Ltd [2000] UKEAT 1435_99_0706 (7 June 2000)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/2000/1435_99_0706.html
Cite as: [2000] UKEAT 1435_99_0706, [2000] UKEAT 1435_99_706

[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]


BAILII case number: [2000] UKEAT 1435_99_0706
Appeal No. EAT/1435/99

EMPLOYMENT APPEAL TRIBUNAL
58 VICTORIA EMBANKMENT, LONDON EC4Y 0DS
             At the Tribunal
             On 7 June 2000

Before

HIS HONOUR JUDGE WILCOX

LORD DAVIES OF COITY CBE

MRS J M MATTHIAS



MR BRIAN BATES APPELLANT

POWERTECH DESIGN LTD RESPONDENT


Transcript of Proceedings

JUDGMENT

PRELIMINARY HEARING

© Copyright 2000


    APPEARANCES

     

    For the Appellant NO APPEARANCE OR
    REPRESENTATION
    BY OR ON BEHALF OF
    THE APPELLANT
       


     

    JUDGE WILCOX: This is a matter that came before the Employment Tribunal on 21 September 1999. The position is that Mr Bates contends that he was dismissed from his employment by Powertech Design Ltd on or about 17 November 1998. Powertech have not taken any part in these proceedings, they are not represented.

  1. It seems that there is evidence subsequent to that received by the Tribunal, by way of a letter from the Benefits Agency, a letter of 29 October 1999 confirming that they had spoken to the employer and that the employer confirmed that the employment came to an end due to redundancy. The documentation, by way of a fact-finding note, seems to corroborate that too.
  2. The second issue is clearly that relating to the late seeking of an application before the Tribunal. The explanation given was that was due to representations made to the Respondent following advice from the Department of Trade & Industry.
  3. We have come to the conclusion that there may well be arguable matters that properly warrant further investigation and a full hearing on this matter, relating to the reception of the evidence of 29 October 1999, that letter, and also to evaluating the explanation as to the late making of the application due to the representations made in the letters of the DTI and the following, it is said, of that advice. To that extent, therefore, we allow this matter to go to a full hearing. The Category will be Category C. The normal direction will be given as to skeleton arguments and the preparation of a chronology.


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/2000/1435_99_0706.html