& Ors

BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal >> Andre v. LCR Telecom [2000] UKEAT 441_00_1511 (15 November 2000)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/2000/441_00_1511.html
Cite as: [2000] UKEAT 441_00_1511, [2000] UKEAT 441__1511

[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]


BAILII case number: [2000] UKEAT 441_00_1511
Appeal No. EAT/441/00

EMPLOYMENT APPEAL TRIBUNAL
58 VICTORIA EMBANKMENT, LONDON EC4Y 0DS
             At the Tribunal
             On 15 November 2000

Before

HIS HONOUR JUDGE D M LEVY QC

MR J C SHRIGLEY

MR A D TUFFIN CBE



MR G ANDRE APPELLANT

LCR TELECOM RESPONDENT


Transcript of Proceedings

JUDGMENT

PRELIMINARY HEARING

© Copyright 2000


    APPEARANCES

     

    For the Appellant SIMON ROBINSON
    (Of Counsel)
    Instructed by
    Messrs Kenningham Underwood Armstrong
    Solicitors
    Prudential Chambers
    11 Ivegate
    Bradford
    West Yorkshire
    BD1 1SQ
       


     

    JUDGE LEVY QC

  1. This is an Appeal by the employee Mr G Andre against a decision of the Employment Tribunal sitting at London (North) on 8 February 2000. On that date the Tribunal heard an Application for unfair dismissal made against the Respondent to this Appeal and determined that the effective date of termination of the Applicant's employment with the Respondent was 25 May 1999.
  2. The decision was sent to the parties on 28 February 2000. From that decision the Appellant appeals. A point is taken by Mr Robinson, who did not appear below, that the Tribunal overlooked properly to consider the provisions as they now are of Section 97 (2) of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
  3. That did not feature in the Notice of Appeal as originally drafted and we gave leave for the Notice of Appeal to be amended to abandon the points taken and to substitute that 1 point. Having looked at the sub-section and the authority to which we were referred, namely Secretary of State for Employment v Staffordshire County Council [1989] IRLR 117, we are satisfied that there is an arguable point to go forward on this 1 ground of Appeal to a full hearing. We estimate the time of it would be 2 hours, and it should be Category C.
  4. An amended Notice of Appeal should be lodged promptly.


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/2000/441_00_1511.html