BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal >> College of Ripon & York St John v. Hobbs [2000] UKEAT 585_00_1611 (16 November 2000)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/2000/585_00_1611.html
Cite as: [2000] UKEAT 585__1611, [2000] UKEAT 585_00_1611

[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]


BAILII case number: [2000] UKEAT 585_00_1611
Appeal No. EAT/585/00

EMPLOYMENT APPEAL TRIBUNAL
58 VICTORIA EMBANKMENT, LONDON EC4Y 0DS
             At the Tribunal
             On 16 November 2000

Before

HIS HONOUR JUDGE A WILKIE QC

MR P DAWSON OBE

MR J C SHRIGLEY



COLLEGE OF RIPON & YORK ST JOHN APPELLANT

DR C C HOBBS RESPONDENT


Transcript of Proceedings

JUDGMENT

PRELIMINARY HEARING

© Copyright 2000


    APPEARANCES

     

    For the Appellant MISS KATIE NOWELL
    (Of Counsel)
    Instructed by
    Messrs Horwich Farrelly
    Solicitors
    National House
    36 St Ann Street
    Manchester
    M60 8HF
       


     

    JUDGE WILKIE QC

  1. This is an Appeal by College of Ripon & York St John against the decision of an Employment Tribunal held at Leeds on 14 March 2000 in which they unanimously concluded as a preliminary issue that the Applicant Dr Hobbs is disabled within the meaning of the Disability Discrimination Act 1995. The Appeal is set out in a Notice of Appeal dated 3 May and received on 16 May. We have the benefits of being addressed by Miss Nowell of Counsel who has supplied us with very helpful skeleton argument.
  2. Suffice it to say that, after some hesitation, we have concluded that she has disclosed an arguable case on this Appeal and therefore it should proceed to a full hearing. There is no need to amend the grounds of appeal as they set out clearly the issues involved. We agree with her that this may be a case of some significance and therefore we give it Category B but we think it could probably be heard within half a day.


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/2000/585_00_1611.html