![]() |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal >> Zalzala v. Sheffield University [2000] UKEAT 976_99_1402 (14 February 2000) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/2000/976_99_1402.html Cite as: [2000] UKEAT 976_99_1402 |
[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]
At the Tribunal | |
Before
HIS HONOUR JUDGE HAROLD WILSON
MR P A L PARKER CBE
MR P M SMITH
APPELLANT | |
RESPONDENT |
Transcript of Proceedings
JUDGMENT
PRELIMINARY HEARING – EX PARTE
For the Appellant | MS E SMITH (of Counsel) Appearing under ELAAS |
JUDGE WILSON: This has been the preliminary hearing of the proposed appeal by the original applicant before the Employment Tribunal, concerning the Employment Tribunal's refusal to review its decision to make an order for costs against the original applicant with regard to events on 1st June 1999.
(1) whether the tribunal should have made an order for costs at all, in light of the information they had concerning the circumstances in which the preliminary fixing of the date in March had been made; and in light of the matters disclosed in the letter of 18th May 1999;
(2) whether the Employment Tribunal erred in failing to particularise the matters upon which they based their order for costs so far as its quantification was concerned; and finally,
(3) whether in law the order for costs, if made, should have been expressed "costs to be decided after final adjudication".
On those three matters we think there should be full argument.