[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]
	United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal >> Woolworths Plc v. Roe [2001] UKEAT 0590_00_1210 (12 October 2001) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/2001/0590_00_1210.html Cite as: [2001] UKEAT 0590_00_1210, [2001] UKEAT 590__1210

[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]

APPEARANCES

 

For the Appellant	NO APPEARANCE OR REPRESENTATION BY OR ON BEHALF OF THE APPELLANT
For the Respondent	NO APPEARANCE OR REPRESENTATION BY OR ON BEHALF OF THE RESPONDENT


 


HIS HONOUR JUDGE J R REID QC

1. This is an appeal from a decision of an Employment Tribunal sitting at Liverpool on
   15 February 2001.
2. It has been agreed between the Appellant and the Respondent that the matter must go back for a re-hearing. A draft order by consent has been put before us by which the appeal is allowed. The decision is set aside and the matter is remitted for re-hearing before a differently constituted Employment Tribunal.
3. We agree that that is an appropriate order to make and so make it. In making it, we should make it abundantly clear, that this represents no criticism whatsoever of the Tribunal which produced a carefully reasoned and lengthy decision. The difficulty that the Tribunal had was the, then existing, state of the law. The law has since been clarified by the Court of Appeal. It has emerged as a result of the decision of the Court of Appeal that the law, as understood by the Tribunal, and as reflected in decisions of the Employment Appeal Tribunal, was not as the Tribunal believed it to be. In those circumstances, they, entirely understandably, proceeded on what has subsequently been found by the Court of Appeal to be an inaccurate basis of law.
4. In the circumstances, as I have said, by consent this appeal must be allowed and the matter remitted for a re-hearing before a differently constituted Tribunal.