BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal >> PSE Electronics Ltd v. Broaders [2001] UKEAT 0744_01_2610 (26 October 2001)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/2001/0744_01_2610.html
Cite as: [2001] UKEAT 744_1_2610, [2001] UKEAT 0744_01_2610

[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]


BAILII case number: [2001] UKEAT 0744_01_2610
Appeal No. EAT/0744/01

EMPLOYMENT APPEAL TRIBUNAL
58 VICTORIA EMBANKMENT, LONDON EC4Y 0DS
             At the Tribunal
             On 26 October 2001

Before

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE WALL

MR I EZEKIEL

LORD GLADWIN OF CLEE CBE JP



PSE ELECTRONICS LTD APPELLANT

MR D N BROADERS RESPONDENT


Transcript of Proceedings

JUDGMENT

PRELIMINARY HEARING

© Copyright 2001


    APPEARANCES

     

    For the Appellant NO APPEARANCE OR
    REPRESENTATION
    BY OR ON BEHALF OF
    THE APPELLANT
       


     

    THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE WALL

  1. This is the Preliminary Hearing of an appeal by PSE Electronics Ltd against the decision of Miss Woolley, sitting alone, in the Manchester Employment Tribunal on 15 May 2001. The issue before Miss Woolley was the question of unauthorised deductions from the Respondent's wages. Miss Woolley investigated the matter with some care and great clarity. Miss Woolley decided that there had been a deduction of £411.71 from the Respondent's wages and she made an Order in those terms.
  2. The appeal which is dated 5 June 2001 gives us the only ground of appeal; that the Respondent had already taken his full holiday entitlement for which he had been paid. No other ground of appeal is advanced. That is a point which Miss Woolley dealt with in the course of her reasons. She made clear findings of fact about the amount of time by way of holiday that the Respondent had taken. It is perhaps worthy of note that Miss Woolley found the Respondent to be an honest and truthful witness.
  3. It seems to us therefore that this careful judgment is 'bomb proof' and that the appeal raises simply an issue of fact and no point of law. No one has appeared today to argue it and in the circumstances it will be dismissed.


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/2001/0744_01_2610.html