BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal >> Masih v. Time Computers Ltd & Anor [2001] UKEAT 1233_00_1403 (14 March 2001)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/2001/1233_00_1403.html
Cite as: [2001] UKEAT 1233_00_1403, [2001] UKEAT 1233__1403

[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]


BAILII case number: [2001] UKEAT 1233_00_1403
Appeal No. EAT/1233/00

EMPLOYMENT APPEAL TRIBUNAL
58 VICTORIA EMBANKMENT, LONDON EC4Y 0DS
             At the Tribunal
             On 14 March 2001

Before

MISS RECORDER ELIZABETH SLADE QC

MRS T A MARSLAND

MRS D M PALMER



MR J MASIH APPELLANT

1) TIME COMPUTERS LTD
2) MR S MASTERS
RESPONDENT


Transcript of Proceedings

JUDGMENT

PRELIMINARY HEARING

© Copyright 2001


    APPEARANCES

     

    For the Appellant MR DENNEMONT
    Messrs Shah
    Solicitors
    168 Greenford road
    Sudbury Hill
    Middlesex HA1 3QZ
    For the Respondent  


     

    MISS RECORDER ELIZABETH SLADE QC

  1. We have an appeal by Mr Masih. There has been no appearance by Mr Masih himself or his legal representative. From the file it is apparent that he has legal representation. Contact was made with his solicitors this morning and the solicitors have sent a fax stating that counsel had been instructed to attend this Preliminary Hearing and that the solicitors understand that counsel has been taken ill suddenly and was not able to attend. The solicitors tender their apologies and request an adjournment to a later date.
  2. The circumstances in which the Employment Appeal Tribunal was given this information are these; that there was no appearance by or on behalf of Mr Masih and a telephone call was made to the solicitors on the record. But for that telephone call, who knows whether contact would have been made or explanation tendered. We consider that that sort of conduct is a discourtesy to this court and also is not a desirable state of affairs for the expeditious disposal of cases. Some notification should have been given if an urgent situation arose before the information was elicited We wish to express our displeasure at what has occurred. However, the Appellant should not be prejudiced by the conduct of his legal representatives and we consider that in the circumstances this matter should be adjourned to a date to be fixed.


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/2001/1233_00_1403.html