BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal >> Khalid v. Bradford City Taxis Ltd & Ors [2001] UKEAT 1315_00_0405 (4 May 2001)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/2001/1315_00_0405.html
Cite as: [2001] UKEAT 1315_00_0405, [2001] UKEAT 1315__405

[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]


BAILII case number: [2001] UKEAT 1315_00_0405
Appeal No. EAT/1315/00

EMPLOYMENT APPEAL TRIBUNAL
58 VICTORIA EMBANKMENT, LONDON EC4Y 0DS
             At the Tribunal
             On 4 May 2001

Before

HER HONOUR JUDGE A WAKEFIELD

MR B R GIBBS

MR D J HODGKINS CB



MR C D KHALID APPELLANT

BRADFORD CITY TAXIS LTD AND OTHERS RESPONDENT


Transcript of Proceedings

JUDGMENT

PRELIMINARY HEARING EX-PARTE

© Copyright 2001


    APPEARANCES

     

    For the Appellant THE APPELLANT
    IN PERSON
       


     

    JUDGE WAKEFIELD

  1. This is an Ex Parte Preliminary Hearing of the Appeal of Mr C Khalid against the decision of an Employment Tribunal sitting at Leeds on 21 August 2000 whereby they dismissed his application based on racial discrimination, on the grounds that it was out of time and that it was not just and equitable for it to be allowed to proceed.
  2. The matters complained of in originating application had occurred in February 1997 and July and October 1998. The originating application was presented on 20 April 2000. As the Employment Tribunal identified in its decision, in order to substantiate the complaints (which were based on failure by the Respondent to allocate to the Appellant taxi jobs by reason of his race) the Appellant would have had to rely on brief conversations taking place between the taxi operator and the taxi drivers over their radios, such conversations having taken place some years earlier and there being little or no documentation.
  3. The Employment Tribunal correctly identified the evidential problems which would face both parties if the matter were allowed to proceed so long after the events relied upon had occurred. They considered also the question of prejudice to the parties. The Appellant was in an unfortunate position since he had, immediately after the latest event relied upon in October 1998, consulted the Bradford Equality Council, which had let him down and failed to pursue his case.
  4. Notwithstanding this, the Tribunal held that in all the circumstances it would not be just and equitable to allow the application to proceed. We are unable to say that the Employment Tribunal made any error in law and the Appeal must fail.


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/2001/1315_00_0405.html