BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal >> Collett v. Diocese of Hallam Trustee [2001] UKEAT 1400_00_0105 (1 May 2001)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/2001/1400_00_0105.html
Cite as: [2001] UKEAT 1400_00_0105, [2001] UKEAT 1400__105

[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]


BAILII case number: [2001] UKEAT 1400_00_0105
Appeal No. EAT/1400/00

EMPLOYMENT APPEAL TRIBUNAL
58 VICTORIA EMBANKMENT, LONDON EC4Y 0DS
             At the Tribunal
             On 1 May 2001

Before

HER HONOUR JUDGE A WAKEFIELD

MISS C HOLROYD

MR R THOMSON



MRS P B COLLETT APPELLANT

DIOCESE OF HALLAM TRUSTEE RESPONDENT


Transcript of Proceedings

JUDGMENT

PRELIMINARY HEARING

© Copyright 2001


    APPEARANCES

     

    For the Appellant MR MARK AFEEVA
    (of Counsel)
    Instructed by:
    Sheffield Law Centre
    Waverley House
    10 Joiner Street
    Sheffield
       


     

    JUDGE A WAKEFIELD

  1. This is an ex-parte preliminary hearing of an appeal by Mrs P Collett against a Decision of an Employment Tribunal sitting at Sheffield and given on 28 September 2000, by which it was decided, as a preliminary point of law, that she was not disabled within the meaning of Section 1 of the Disability Discrimination Act 1995.
  2. The grounds of appeal are twofold: firstly that the Employment Tribunal erred in law in that it failed to make any reference, in considering the issue of disability, to the guidance issued by the Secretary of State pursuant to Section 3 of the Act and secondly that it erred in law in that it failed to consider disability in the period subsequent to the date of the complaint.
  3. In our view, both these grounds are arguable. It is clear from the Decision itself and from the reasons given for a refusal to review that Decision, the latter determination having been made on 5 February 2001, that the Employment Tribunal were not referred at the original hearing to the guidance under Section 3 and did not themselves consider that guidance. They should have done so. See Goodwin v The Patent Office [1999] IRLR 4. That failure may impugn the original Decision.
  4. It is also clear that the only period of time the Employment Tribunal considered, for the purposes of determining the issue of disability, was that up to the time of the complaint. As referred to in Greenwood v British Airways PLC [1999] ICR 969, the Appellant's condition, up to and including the Tribunal hearing should also have been taken into account.
  5. The appeal will therefore proceed to a full hearing. Category C, half a day, and Skeleton Arguments should be delivered to this Tribunal and exchanged, not later than 14 days prior to the hearing date.


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/2001/1400_00_0105.html