BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal >> Jangra v. Gate Gourmet London Ltd [2001] UKEAT 608_01_0810 (8 October 2001)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/2001/608_01_0810.html
Cite as: [2001] UKEAT 608_01_0810, [2001] UKEAT 608_1_810

[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]


BAILII case number: [2001] UKEAT 608_01_0810
Appeal No. EAT/608/01

EMPLOYMENT APPEAL TRIBUNAL
58 VICTORIA EMBANKMENT, LONDON EC4Y 0DS
             At the Tribunal
             On 8 October 2001

Before

HER HONOUR JUDGE A WAKEFIELD

MRS J M MATTHIAS

MR N D WILLIS



MRS S B JANGRA APPELLANT

GATE GOURMET LONDON LTD RESPONDENT


Transcript of Proceedings

JUDGMENT

PRELIMINARY HEARING

© Copyright 2001


    APPEARANCES

     

    For the Appellant MR AUBURNE
    (of Counsel)
    Appearing under the
    Employment Law Appeal
    Advice Scheme
       


     

    JUDGE A WAKEFIELD

  1. This is an ex parte preliminary hearing of an appeal by Mrs S B Jangra against a Decision dated 15 March 2001 of an Employment Tribunal sitting at London South, at which it was held that:
  2. "(1) The internal appeal cured the procedural unfairness so as to render the dismissal of the Applicant fair overall.
    (2) The Respondent did not discriminate against the Applicant contrary to section 5(1) of the Disability Discrimination Act 1995."

    Leave has been granted to proceed to a full hearing in relation to the second finding.

  3. As to the first finding, it was argued before us that the Employment Tribunal were wrong in law and/or perverse in that, since the Appellant did not attend the internal appeal, it cannot be said to have constituted a rehearing of the case, so as to be capable of curing a procedural irregularity in the original dismissal. We do not agree. The Appellant was given a full opportunity to attend at the internal appeal or to make written submissions. She did neither. The appeal hearing therefore necessarily consisted of consideration of the medical evidence and the possibility of alternative employment.
  4. The finding of the Employment Tribunal that in those circumstances:
  5. "…once the applicant exercised the right to appeal she could not frustrate that appeal process by refusing to take part…"

    is, in our view, unassailable. The appeal on this ground therefore fails, and is dismissed.


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/2001/608_01_0810.html