BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal >> HM Attorney General v Bruce [2006] UKEAT 0586_05_1204 (12 April 2006)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/2006/0586_05_1204.html
Cite as: [2006] UKEAT 586_5_1204, [2006] UKEAT 0586_05_1204

[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]

BAILII case number: [2006] UKEAT 0586_05_1204
Appeal No. UKEAT/0586/05

EMPLOYMENT APPEAL TRIBUNAL
58 VICTORIA EMBANKMENT, LONDON EC4Y 0DS
             At the Tribunal
             Written Application

Before

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE LANGSTAFF

MS B SWITZER

MR S YEBOAH


HER MAJESTY’S ATTORNEY GENERAL APPLICANT

MR V BRUCE RESPONDENT

Transcript of Proceedings

JUDGMENT

APPLICATION FOR A STAY OF THE ORDER OF THE EMPLOYMENT APPEAL TRIBUNAL SEALED ON THE 3RD DAY OF FEBRUARY 2006

© Copyright 2006

    THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE LANGSTAFF

  1. An Order once made should remain in force unless there is a good reason why it should be stayed. None is advanced. Nor can one be implied purely from the declaration by the respondent that he intends to appeal our decision.

  2. If he succeeds in obtaining permission from the Court of Appeal he may invite that Court to consider staying our order. If he applies and fails there is no good reason for us to stay our order.

  3. The logic of our decision is that the respondent should not be able to institute fresh proceedings without leave. This does not prevent him from seeking permission to appeal our order.

BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/2006/0586_05_1204.html