English Heritage (Decision Notice) [2012] UKICO FER0445314 (17 July 2012)


BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Information Commissioner's Office


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Information Commissioner's Office >> English Heritage (Decision Notice) [2012] UKICO FER0445314 (17 July 2012)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKICO/2012/FER0445314.html
Cite as: [2012] UKICO FER0445314, [2012] UKICO FER445314

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


English Heritage (Decision Notice) [2012] UKICO FER0445314 (17 July 2012)

Summary: The complainant made a request to English Heritage for all written material in relation to structures affected by the redevelopment of London Bridge Railway Station, namely the South Eastern Railway Offices (SER Offices), the Charles Henry Driver trainshed and the flank wall on St Thomas Street. The Commissioner-™s decision is that English Heritage was entitled to rely on the exception under regulation 12(4)(b) of the EIR to the extent that the complainant-™s request was a repeated request for information that has already been disclosed to the complainant. He considers that the public interest in maintaining the exception outweighs the public interest in disclosing the information to the extent that the request amounted to a repeated request for information. To the extent that the scope of the complainant-™s request goes beyond the information that has been disclosed to the complainant, the Commissioner does not consider that the exception under regulation 12(4)(b) of the EIR is engaged. The Commissioner requires English Heritage to respond to the complainant-™s request of 25 February 2012 either providing any information within the scope of the request that has not previously been provided to the complainant or issuing a valid refusal notice under regulation 14 of the EIR citing an exception other than regulation 12(4)(b) of the EIR.
Section of Act/EIR & Finding: EIR 12.4.b - Complaint Partly Upheld

A HTML version of this file is not available click here to view the whole pdf version : [2012] UKICO FER0445314


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKICO/2012/FER0445314.html