UK Anti-Doping (Other) [2023] UKICO 205693 (15 February 2023)


BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Information Commissioner's Office
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Information Commissioner's Office >> UK Anti-Doping (Other) [2023] UKICO 205693 (15 February 2023)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKICO/2023/205693.html
Cite as: [2023] UKICO 205693

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]

UK Anti-Doping

The complainant has requested information from UK Anti-Doping (UKAD) relating to Athlete Biological Passports (ABP). UKAD provided some information, stated that it did not hold some information, and withheld some information under section 31 (law enforcement) of FOIA. The Commissioner’s decision is that UKAD has correctly cited section 31 of FOIA and that the public interest does not favour the releases of this information. However, it breached section 10(1) and 17(1) of FOIA. The Commissioner does not require UKAD to take any steps.

FOI 31: Complaint not upheld FOI 17: Complaint upheld FOI 10: Complaint upheld

Decision notice: 205693

BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKICO/2023/205693.html