BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions >> James Richard Jackson v Carbury Herne Limited (Patent) [2000] UKIntelP o26500 (20 June 2000) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2000/o26500.html Cite as: [2000] UKIntelP o26500 |
||
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
For the whole decision click here: o26500
Summary
In an earlier action for inventorship and entitlement (interim decision [2000] UKIntelP o18200) in respect of an unpublished, terminated GB application, joint inventorship and joint entitlement was established. However, none of the specific remedies requested by the referrer were available to him given the status of the GB application. The Hearing Officer, however, made findings of fact as to the position and indicated that these could be used by the referrer to support a reference in respect of a PCT application (WO 9832018) claiming priority from the GB application. Therefore the interim decision was issued to allow the referrer to consider whether to start action under section 12 in respect of the WO application, and to allow the parties to consider settlement in the light of the findings of fact.
After the referrer launched an action under section 12, the parties indicated that they were happy for a final decision on the GB application to be issued. This decision therefore made no order other than to confirm the findings of fact as stated in the earlier, interim decision ([2000] UKIntelP o18200) and to terminate the proceedings in respect of the GB application.
