[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions >> ZOOM (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o30500 (22 August 2000) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2000/o30500.html Cite as: [2000] UKIntelP o30500 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
For the whole decision click here: o30500
Result
Opposition succeeded under Sections 3(1)(b) & (c)
Opposition failed under Sections 3(1)(a) & 3(1)(d)
Opposition failed under Section 3(3)(b)
Opposition under Section 3(6) dismissed no evidence provided
Points Of Interest
Summary
The Hearing Officer found from the evidence that the word ZOOM is an apt name for sensitized photographic film. The evidence did not however show that the public would be deceived as to the natural quality or geographic origin of the products if the mark were applied to any of the applicants' goods.