BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions >> AIRMASTER (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2001] UKIntelP o21801 (3 May 2001)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2001/o21801.html
Cite as: [2001] UKIntelP o21801

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


AIRMASTER (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2001] UKIntelP o21801 (3 May 2001)

For the whole decision click here: o21801

Trade mark decision

BL Number
O/218/01
Decision date
3 May 2001
Hearing officer
Mr C Bowen
Mark
AIRMASTER
Classes
11
Applicant
Richard Gatley
Opponent
R & D Ventilation Systems Ltd
Opposition
Sections 3(1)(b) & (c), Section 3(6)

Result

Section 3(1)(b) & (c): - Opposition failed.

Section 3(6) - Opposition succeeded.

Points Of Interest

Summary

The opponents in these proceedings (but under a different name) had earlier applied for a very similar mark for identical goods and had been refused registration by the Registrar. The Hearing Officer in this case applied the Registrar’s practice in relation to "MASTER" marks to the goods at issue here and concluded that the mark AIRMASTER was not precluded from registration by the terms of Section 3(1)(b) and (c) of the Act. It followed that the mark as a totality was also acceptable.

In the recent past the mark at issue here had been used by a company which had gone into voluntary liquidation and the applicant had applied for registration in his own name shortly afterwards. At the date of application rights in the mark were owned by the company in liquidation and therefore the applicant was not the proprietor when he made his application. Opposition under Section 3(6) succeeded.



BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2001/o21801.html