BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions >> DAPA (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2001] UKIntelP o38101 (4 September 2001) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2001/o38101.html Cite as: [2001] UKIntelP o38101 |
||
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
For the whole decision click here: o38101
Result
Section 3 - Opposition failed on all grounds.
Section 5: - Opposition failed on all grounds.
Points Of Interest
Summary
The opposition was based on the opponents’ mark ZAPA. The Hearing Officer dismissed the grounds under Sections 3(3) and 3(6) since only evidence of relative factors had been filed, and none bearing on bad faith. The Hearing Officer went on to find that DAPA was not so descriptive that the public could not be brought to recognise it as a trade mark, nor was it a term customary in the current language of the trade. The opposition under Sections 3(1) and 3(3) failed accordingly. Under Section 5(2)(b) the Hearing Officer found that all factors considered, there was no realistic likelihood of confusion. This effectively decided the matter under Sections 5(3) and 5(4) also.
