BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions >> WINFIELD (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2002] UKIntelP o18702 (29 April 2002) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2002/o18702.html Cite as: [2002] UKIntelP o18702 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
For the whole decision click here: o18702
Result
Amendments to TM 7 permitted.
Amended counter-statement not admitted to the proceedings.
Points Of Interest
Summary
An extended process of pleadings resulted in a query as to the number and identity of the opponents. Was there a clerical error and could it be amended? On several occasions where it would have been possible, the applicants raised no query. The Hearing Officer concluded that there had been a clerical error and it was waiving the powers of the Registry to allow a correction.