[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions >> CDCARD (Trade Mark: Revocation) [2002] UKIntelP o26902 (12 June 2002) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2002/o26902.html Cite as: [2002] UKIntelP o26902 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
For the whole decision click here: o26902
Result
Costs awarded to respondent.
Points Of Interest
Summary
At a preliminary hearing in these proceedings the Registrar’s Hearing Officer had refused the applicants an extension of time in which to file evidence in reply (see BL O/243/01). The applicants appealed to the Appointed Person. In the meantime they had succeeded in their invalidation/revocation action (see BL O/173/02). They withdrew their appeal; the registered proprietor therefore applied for costs in respect of the abandoned appeal.
The Appointed Person ruled that the abandonment of an appeal is "indistinguishable from a dismissal of the appeal by consent", and an award of costs to the respondent was therefore appropriate. After consideration of submissions from both sides the Appointed Person made an award of costs to the registered proprietor, within the Registrar’s published scale.