BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions >> MIRIVAIR (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2002] UKIntelP o41802 (14 October 2002) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2002/o41802.html Cite as: [2002] UKIntelP o41802 |
||
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
For the whole decision click here: o41802
Result
Section 5(2)(b): - Opposition successful.
Points Of Interest
Summary
The opponents opposition was based on their ownership of a registration in Class 5 of the mark MIRVIVA in respect of the same and similar goods as those of the applicants.
Both parties filed submissions about the similarity of the respective marks, the opponents claiming that the marks were confusingly similar, the applicants that the marks were not similar.
In considering the matter under Section 5(2)(b) the Hearing Officer noted that identical goods were at issue and went on to compare the respective marks MIRIVAIR and MIRVIVA. The Hearing Officer noted that the two marks had the same suffix and were of similar length. Aurally it was possible to pronounce the two marks differently but there was no evidence on this point and some pronunciations could be similar. Conceptually both marks would be seen as invented words. On a global appreciation and bearing in mind that identical goods were at issue the Hearing Officer decided there was a likelihood of confusion of the public. Opposition thus succeeded.
