BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions >> POPSTAR MAKER (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2003] UKIntelP o15703 (12 June 2003)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2003/o15703.html
Cite as: [2003] UKIntelP o15703

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


POPSTAR MAKER (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2003] UKIntelP o15703 (12 June 2003)

For the whole decision click here: o15703

Trade mark decision

BL Number
O/157/03
Decision date
12 June 2003
Hearing officer
Mr M Knight
Mark
POPSTAR MAKER
Classes
09
Applicant
Eidos Interactive Ltd
Opponent
Magnus Fahlen
Opposition
.Decision on request to amend pleadings in opposition proceedings

Result

Request for amendment of pleadings refused.

Points Of Interest

Summary

This was one of two requests by the opponents in the proceedings designated Opposition No 80513 (see also BL O/158/03). In this instance they sought to add Section 5(2)(b) to the statement of grounds. The Hearing Officer noted that the request had come very late in the day, the opponents appeared reluctant to confirm that they would not be seeking to file evidence in support of the new ground or that they would not also be seeking to add yet a further objection under Section 3(6).

A decision of the ECJ had further clarified the matter of identicality under Section 5(1) and this had given rise to the need to add a Section 5(2) ground. However, the request could have come much sooner, and Section 5(2) could well require evidence in relation to use. The applicants would have no time properly to consider their position.

The Hearing Officer refused the request for the amendment.



BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2003/o15703.html