[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions >> Mr M A McKenzie (Patent) [2003] UKIntelP o18203 (25 June 2003) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2003/o18203.html Cite as: [2003] UKIntelP o18203 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
For the whole decision click here: o18203
Summary
During the course of examination the claims were amended several times in response to novelty, inventive step and clarity objections but none of the amended claims were considered to meet the objections and, additionally, some of the amended claims were deemed to add matter.
The HO held that the examiners objections were well-founded and that, whilst amendments could be made to clarify the claims and remove the added matter, there were no technical features in the application as originally filed which could be added to the claims in order to meet the novelty and inventive step objections. The application was refused.