BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions >> New Constructs LLC (Patent) [2007] UKIntelP o01407 (12 January 2007)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2007/o01407.html
Cite as: [2007] UKIntelP o1407, [2007] UKIntelP o01407

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


New Constructs LLC [2007] UKIntelP o01407 (12 January 2007)

For the whole decision click here: o01407

Patent decision

BL number
O/014/07
Concerning rights in
GB 0502642.2.
Hearing Officer
Mr D J Barford
Decision date
12 January 2007
Person(s) or Company(s) involved
New Constructs LLC
Provisions discussed
PA 1977 section 1(2)
Keywords
Excluded fields (refused)
Related Decisions
None

Summary

The application relates to analyzing accounting data in order to obtain economic profitability information. It is particularly directed towards correcting for accounting distortions in reported company information, and using the corrected data to evaluate the true value of a company. The systems and methods described have particular application in decision-making in the field of investments.

Applying the four-step approach to the assessment of patentability under section 1(2) approved by the Court of Appeal in Aerotel/Macrossan [2006] EWCA Civ 1371, the hearing officer concluded that that the claimed invention is excluded from patentability under section 1(2) as a method of doing business as such, and that the invention as claimed in certain of the claims is additionally excluded from patentability as a program for a computer or the presentation of information as such. He could see no subject matter in the application that could be used to remedy this and refused the application under section 18(3).



BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2007/o01407.html