BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions >> CAMELLIA device Japanese letters (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2007] UKIntelP o21707 (1 August 2007) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2007/o21707.html Cite as: [2007] UKIntelP o21707 |
||
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
For the whole decision click here: o21707
Result
Section 3(1)(b) & (c): Opposition successful. Section 3(1)(d): Opposition failed Section 5(4)(a): Opposition failed
Points Of Interest
Summary
Aside from the objections on absolute grounds, the opponents also claimed to have used the symbol of a camellia on a wide variety of items, including some in the applicants’ specification.
The Hearing Officer dealt firstly with the objection under 3(1)(d), which he dismissed since there was no evidence that the word was customary in the common parlance or practices of the trade; in any case the additional device of ‘Katakana’ symbols meant that the mark did not ‘consist exclusively of’ - as required by that Section.
Under Sections 3(1)(b) & (c) however, CAMELLIA had to be regarded as a word descriptive of goods that were representations of that shrub or flower; notionally, all of the goods specified. The opposition brought on those grounds succeeded therefore.
Under Section 5(4)(a) the opposition failed; the opponents had successfully shown that other traders produced goods in the shape of camellias; such use therefore could not have been exclusive to them.
